The qualify, I do not imply the Arabic word that means the "recitation", but rather the text that's attributed to Mohammed and used by his followers worldwide as the "word of Allah".

Also, the Arabic word "Allah", or "al-ilah" means "the one to be worshipped", and I do not believe a desire for worship is an aspect of god, just as I do would not desire for anything to worship me, even if I created them, like in a story or as a robot.

And I do not like to capitalize the letter "G" in "god" because I do not consider god to be a proper noun. I may have used the notation in the past, and may intentionally or accidentally use it in the future when trying to converse with some people, just to ensure that we are talking about the same idea that means "the source of creation".

Slide 1

Image: [Qur'aan]

The Qur'aan is a book of deception.

Why do I say this?

Slide 2

People who follow Mohammed often say things such as that "sex slaves can be given in marriage to free Muslims" in Qur'aan 4:X1.

But marriage is not necessary when having relations with the concubines according to

The context in 4:X1 simply is in relation to providing believing slaves to Muslims who have not found a wife.

Slide 3

Similarly, the context about Jihaad

todo Write about semantic ambiguity and polysemy of words, and the probability of these words.
Write about how people cannot be forced to choose or reject an operating system by analyzing every aspect of it.

But when it comes to religion, the interpretations of certain people pose a threat. And by the probability that I have mentioned above.

A text that is from an intelligent source, and advocates for the well-being of sentient beings will not have such a large semantic distance.

I know it is a bad time for Muslims, but the thing is, it's always a bad time for Muslims, because they always want to cause problems for non-Muslims. Oh, not the individuals, just a few in the community.

Islaam - Post

Slide 1

Slide 2

Slide 3

Tags